What if
September 03, 2010, 09:05:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Links Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
  Print  
Author Topic: New what-if 1939-45 twin-boomers  (Read 20679 times)
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« on: June 14, 2008, 03:59:03 PM »

Thanks to joncarrfarrelly at http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,16989.0.html
here is the Miles M.2222 – twin fuselage of course as the Blériot 2222…

Logged
Hobbes
What-IF SIG
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3478



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2008, 04:09:30 PM »

Christophe, welcome back!
Logged
Aircav
Knows a lass who ended up working in Hull
What-IF SIG
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6001



« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2008, 07:49:21 PM »

Great to have you back again  Thumbs Up Bow
Logged
The Rat
Proud Designated Pervert
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5886


Never wore a mullet


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2008, 01:11:54 AM »

TOPHE RETURNS!   Party Cheers!
Logged

"My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives." - Hedley Lamarr, Blazing Saddles

Other hobby; Skeptics Canada

Baculum's page
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2008, 05:55:52 AM »

Last September, dear Eddie M. revealed a brand new Twin/Triplex-Spitfire being (secretly) built from Spitfires Mk 2,
See http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,16989.0.html
The prototype of this Spitfire Mk 38, not finished today, will feature a middle wing, tricycle landing gear, main landing gears in the booms, enlarged tail, modern double-wheels.
Here I just present some 1944 drawing steps that may have inspired Eddie: 38-0 like a P-82 with pod, 38-1 triplex engine, 38-2 like a low-wing P-38.

What day is it today? April 1st, 1944, why?
Logged
Eddie M.
Been on the recieving end of some very fine Gentlemen
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4123


The Model Whisperer


« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2008, 10:38:37 AM »

I like the looks of those aircraft! Now all I need is 3 more Spitfires to start again!  afro
  Eddie
Logged

Look behind you!
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2008, 01:43:26 PM »

The Northrop P-61 needed deep improvement in 1943. The USAF required:
- 2 bigger radar, facing fore and aft
- panoramic canopies, facing fore and aft
- only 2 engines and minimum weight increase
This seemed impossible. Then, the asymmetric Bv 141 was reported, and that created the project P-61-141:

« Last Edit: June 15, 2008, 01:51:01 PM by Tophe » Logged
anthonyp
aka Captain Obvious
Global Moderator
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4153



WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2008, 01:48:03 PM »

Cool new info!

Welcome back, Tophe!
Logged

That machine has been misunderstood for years!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man
Nils
Belgium's "Iceman"
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2777


one lab accident away from becoming a supervillian


WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2008, 02:17:44 PM »

awesome new twinboom designs.
what a spectacular comeback Tophe, we all missed you here  Thumbs Up
Logged

on the bench:
-1/144 Aircraft Carrier (on hold)
-1/72 Grumman/Sud Aviation F-14A(FR) Tomcat (Vive La France GB)
-1/72 Do-18 pirate seaplane (pirate GB)
-various 1/72 TinTin & Luft46 models
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2008, 07:16:27 PM »

The Messerschmitt Bf 110, Me 210, Me 410 are well known. The Me 310, Me 510 are less known. But the rest of the family is completely unknown. Here it is, with top secret drawings from MyMind Archives:
- asymmetric: Me 610 (single engine) and Me 710 (twin engine with rear canopy)
- twin-fuselage: Me 810 = Me 410Z Zwilling (triplex engine)
- twin-boom with rear canopy: Me 910 (twin engine with rear canopy)
Logged
sotoolslinger
hopes to get everything hung today
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4321


I am now fairly happy with my lower bits


« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2008, 11:23:24 PM »

 Tophe , everyone keeps saying welcome back, apparantly I have not been here long enough, all I can say is ,where have you been all my life Wub Wub Wub
Logged

I amuse me.
Huge fan of noisy rodent.
Things learned from this site: don't tease wolverine.
Eddie's personal stalker.
Worshippers in Nannerland
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2008, 03:35:04 AM »

I spent last year faking photographs, as a new hobby.

A few results match this topic:
- XF7F-11 TigerCatamaran
- F6F-11 Twin-Hellcat
- XP-51ATM Actual-Twin-Mustang
- P-51DM Double-Mustang
- T-6Z Harvavard
- C-47Z Twin-Skytrain
- P-82BD Single-Bubble Twin-Mustang
(and several others, imperfectly: Double-Vampire, Twin-Twin-Mustang,
F-82S³E, P-51Z³, P-38Z³)
See my Web site http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/fake_aircraft_2.htm
« Last Edit: June 16, 2008, 03:40:58 AM by Tophe » Logged
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2008, 06:29:28 PM »

After the Me 910, there was a follow on, of course.
- Me 1010 = Me 510Z (close to Me 810 like Me 510 is close to Me 410)
- Me 1110 : not used because the Me P.1110 was very different
(see http://www.luft46.com/mess/mep1110j.html )
- Me 1210 = Me 610Z
- Me 1410 = Me 710Z
- Me 1610 = Me 810Z = Me 410Z²
- Me 1810 = Me 910Z
Logged
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2008, 04:23:16 AM »

Of course, the late Me x10 family was odd also, asymmetric:
Me 1310 = 610+710
Me 1510 = 610+910
Me 1710 = 810+910
Logged
Tophe
Needs A Life Outside What-If
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5456



WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2008, 05:10:52 AM »

 The Mk 38 Design 1 had a problem : 3 propellers rotating in the same direction create a huge torque. This has been cured on the Design 1' with a tailplane asymmetry, and that provided clearance for a rear post:

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 21 queries.

Google visited last this page August 27, 2010, 11:36:32 PM