Blue sky oddities!

[Tophe]

This produced the asymmetric MiG-29Z-2

EB, this MiG-29Z-2 I posted long ago was just hoping you would show us the true Asymmetric MiG-29Zwilling... A blind spy drew this below, and this needs your deep improvement maybe: a very short nose on starboard with no foreplane, a long nose on port with two foreplanes; there are also asymmetric fins; port and central, no starboard. Could you show us someday, please?

[ElectrikBlue]

Thanks Stargazer2006 and sorry for the belated reply!

Elmayerle, a zero-length launcher for the F-104 UCAV is a very good idea!
Can also be applied to the F-208 TwinStar!


Tophe I totally forgot the asymmetric MiG-29Zwilling, by the way, yours looks cool! 


Here is the TF4D-K SeaRay a two seater export variant of the F4D Skyray (derived from an idea of Jeffry Fontaine, se here)!
The SeaRay is mainly a F4D-1 + Spey + TA-4J cockpit and an increased tail fin surface.

[Arc3371]

Looks great, the TF-4 might be something for the french

[Tophe]

Thanks for revealing us the F-208 Twin-Star, SO secret and public for us...

[sideshowbob9]

The TF4D is awesome! 

[elmayerle]

That's a truly gorgeous riff on the Skyray.  However, not to go JMN on you, but you're conflating two different designation systems and the resulting designation looks like nonsense.  That should be either a TF-6K or a F4D-2TF (though depending on whether it's a re-engined two-seater or a two-seat equivalent of a re-engined aircraft, it might be a F4D-2FT, the USN's designation system had some flexibility that way).  I don't know that it'd have a special designation for British use unless there were some other special modifications.

[ElectrikBlue]

That's a truly gorgeous riff on the Skyray.  However, not to go JMN on you, but you're conflating two different designation systems and the resulting designation looks like nonsense.  That should be either a TF-6K or a F4D-2TF (though depending on whether it's a re-engined two-seater or a two-seat equivalent of a re-engined aircraft, it might be a F4D-2FT, the USN's designation system had some flexibility that way).  I don't know that it'd have a special designation for British use unless there were some other special modifications.

I prefer the TF-6K designation, thank you for the clarification! 

[jorel62]

LOVE THE SEARAY

[ElectrikBlue]

Thanks Joe!

Looks great, the TF-4 might be something for the french

After its designation as TF-6K, the SeaRay was also bought by the french administration for the Aéronavale!

Some liveries of the SeaRay during her long life in the Flottille 12F...

[pyro-manic]

Superb!

[Stargazer2006]

Those French Searays are quite the thing!!!

Now you make me salivate for single-seater French Skyrays...

[McColm]

Hi I love your designs,
Your early work included a Mirage 4000-9 and I was just wondering if you could alter it slightly to include;
twin verticle tail fins
engine air intakes above the fuselage

Or do a tailess version.

 

[coolusername]

Just wow! Didn't know the Skyray would look good with a tub for two 
Maybe one in OA-4 FAC colors ?

[Arc3371]

Now you make me salivate for single-seater French Skyrays...

Me too

[Scooterman]

Howsabout a USN training TF-6A in orange and white?